Translate

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

REGULATION AND LOCALISATION OF TERTIARY EDUCATION INSITUTIONS IN GHANA: THE EQUITY AND ACCESSIBILITY ARGUMENT

This is the second in my series on Regulating Tertiary Education in Ghana: Regulatory Bodies and Their Mandates. I admit, my first piece was a bit boring and technical. Unfortunately, educating a country with internally generated/directed development is not a joking matter. It is the yoke that seeks the break the neck of the serious minded educationist. We only laugh when perceived ludicrous solutions are being proposed by our international development partners for “non-Ghanaian” owned problems. Discovered and diagnosed by them only. Even then, this laughter is but a sarcastic one. Don’t get me wrong, we still posses the humour and jest to hope in the face of challenging unrelenting educational reform problems. And I digress again. Today I will try and present the situation as I perceive it on the quest to make Tertiary Education equally accessible and equitable to all who qualify in Ghana.

The goal of the Government of Ghana, having jumped on the industrialisation band wagon has been to provide the job market with the requisite qualified personnel. The initial 4 universities (University of Ghana, University of Cape Coast, KNUST and University of Education-Winneba) were deemed to be insufficient to produce the required manpower for the expanding Ghanaian Job market. What was the solution? A very innovative solution was championed by the Government. Bring in the private sector. The introduction and acceptance of private participation in Ghana’s Tertiary Education landscape should not have posed any problems from a regulatory point of view. After all the NCTE and NAB had experience in managing the fore mentioned Universities. Valley View, an SDA established university had been in existence for more than two decades before the mass endorsement of Private Public Partnership (PPP) of Tertiary Education. The onset of PPP saw the Tertiary Education landscape expanding rapidly.

Now for a country of about 30million people, only 15% of this has received Tertiary Education with about 60% having been exposed to a form of formal education at some point in their life. This statistics makes Ghana, what the World Bank considers as the Elitism of Education. The concentration of the Ghanaian population is fairly even regionally. According to the 2010 census report, only Greater Accra and Ashanti Region have more than 20% of their population living in urban centres whilst Eastern Region had about 12% of its population in urban centres. The other three regions average 8% of their regional population in urban centres. Why this statistics? Well a look at the existing 60+ Tertiary Education Institutions will show that about 80% are situated in the Greater Accra Region, whilst Ashanti is hosting 10% the remaining 10% is shared by the other 8 regions. What is of import to note is that almost all the Tertiary Education Institutions are situated in Regional Capitals with the exception of Colleges of Education which may be District Hosted. Deductively then, the Capital Accra is host to 80% of Tertiary Education Institutions.

The statistics presented above throws a harrowing and wavering shadow for the future of education, especially where the mantra of equity and equality is being chanted. After all Accra is responsible for only 24% of the national urban dwellers. One must not forget that Ghana is a country of Urban-Education drive. The rural communities have been ignored, forgotten or under served in the delivery of education. At least at the basic level, even if situated under trees, and staffed by poorly qualified personnel there is some level of education being accessed (quality is another story for another day).

One may ask,
1.      Where are the regulatory bodies for Tertiary Education?
2.      Is there any policy on the situation of Tertiary Education Institutions in Ghana?
3.      Is there Equality and Equity in the delivery of Tertiary Education in Ghana?

In answering question 1, I must say that I am yet to come across any policy frame work on the localisation of Tertiary Education Institutions. Yes the regulatory bodies are present. However internal and intra agency rivalry has incapacitated them. The NCTE in failing to stamp its authority on the tertiary landscape left a gaping hole which NAB tasked with assuring quality had to struggle to fill. Their methods may not be the best, however “half a loaf…”. The NAB and NCTE are thus caught in a Jacob-Essau Struggle. The NABPTEX after several calls to disband it, it is currently endearing itself to the quasi Tertiary Education Institutions. One wonders what will become of them when the Governments call for Technical Universities Materialise (Darwin’s Evolutionary theories come to mind here; when a species specialises in only one food source, the extinction of such a species is directly linked to the survival of said food source). These cross agency struggles has left the private sector to map out Tertiary Education to suit their personal goals; profit generation.

I will not forward an argument for Equality nor Equity, for the charges of accessing Tertiary Education, even when its available is astronomically high. Given that majority of the student population is coming from middle and low income families, makes the fees for education at this level nothing short of economic miracles to maintain/afford. Well at a forum, a presenter jokingly said that Ghanaians are “managers”, they are paid peanuts which should have starved ants, and yet month in and month out, they manage to scrape by. When asked: Masa how be?? A Ghanaian worker is more likely to respond: Masa we are managing.

Conclusively, Tertiary Education is not equitably accessible to Ghanaians even though the 1992 constitution mandates it nor is it equally available to all Ghanaians. Sometimes I worry that in our quest to make Tertiary Education equally and equitably accessible, we may sacrifice quality. In the face of poor regulation,  the mice of the educational field are reeling in the harvest. Government may be making in-roads in establishing Tertiary Education Institutions again, but if this agenda is not decoupled from the political partisanship approach, it may never achieve its set target. The questions of Why set up a tertiary Institution? Where to locate it? Who will or can access it? and What is the mandate of such an institution?; should guide government and the regulatory bodies in their quest to make education equitable and equally accessible. 

No comments:

Post a Comment